TEACHERS’ PERCEPTION OF EFFECTS OF IN-SERVICE TRAINING ON THEIR TEACHING AND ON THEIR STUDENTS LEARNING

Authors

  • Davaajav PUREVJAV Doctoral School of Education, University of Szeged, Hungary Author
  • Edit Katalin Molnár Institute of Education, University of Szeged, Hungary Author

Abstract

There is intensive research on effective methods for in service teacher training (IST; Lipowsky & Rzejak, 2015). However, we know little about teachers’ perceptions of their gains from IST and its effects on their students, though this may contribute to teachers’ motivation to participate in and learn from IST.
This paper reports on two Mongolian studies targeting teachers’ perceptions of IST transfer effects. Study 1 collected information from a representative sample (N1=520) with a self-report questionnaire regarding changes instructional practice. In Study 2 teachers (N2=14) were interviewed about the changes in practice as well as the effects they observed on their students.
In Study 1, statistical analyses revealed that participants rated the changes in knowledge, skills and attitudes similarly. However, in their comments they attributed greater importance to the procedural domain. In Study 2, content analyses confirmed the emphasis on teachers’ skills and abilities. Mostly higher student motivation and sometimes higher achievement were attributed to teacher participation in IST. The interviews revealed a lack of reflectivity in most cases.
The information from quantitative and qualitative methodology provided a more comprehensive view on the effects of IST, which can be used for improving the efficiency of training. The concept and opportunities for reflection seem to be key issues for Mongolian IST curricula.
The project presented is beneficial for raising the effectiveness of IST because of the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. Recently, there has been growing attention on using mixed methodology. – In the present project, the questionnaire and the interview themes were the same, thus information collected in breadth and in depth could be related.

References

Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and teacher education, 27(1), 10-20.

Bando, R., & Li, X. (2014). The effect of in-service teacher training on student learning of English as a second language. Inter-American Development Bank. [IDB] Working Paper Series, No.

IDB-WP-529,

http://hdl.handle.net/11319/6596

Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “highly qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us?. Educational researcher, 31(9), 13-25.

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38(3), 181-199.

DfE. (2013). Teachers’ standards: Guidance for school leaders, school staff and governing bodies. [UK] Department for Education [DfE]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/301107/Teacher s__Standards.pdf

EC (2013). Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes. European

Commission. Retrieved from

http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/school/doc/teachercomp_en.pdf

ITPD (2014). 2014 ony üjl ažillagaany tajlan [2014 yearly action report]. Bagšyn Mèrgèžil Dèèšlüülèx Institut (BMDI) [Institute of Teacher’s Professional Development], Ulaanbaatar,

Mongolia. Retrieved from http://itpd.mn/pdf/2014etses.pdf

Kárpáti, A. (2009). Teacher training and professional development. In K. Fazekas, J. Köllő & J.

Varga (Eds.), Green book for the renewal of public education Hungary (pp. 203-226).

Budapest, Hungary: Institute of Economics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Retrieved from http://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/upload/Hungary/Hungary_Green_book_2009.pdf Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK).

Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

König, J. (2017). Motivations for teaching and relationship to general pedagogical knowledge.

Guerriero, S (ed). Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession.

OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-en

Kotschy, B. (2011, ed.): A pedagógussá válás és a szakmai fejlődés sztenderdjei [Standards of

teacher professional development]. Eger, Hungary: EKF. Retrieved from http://www.epednet.ektf.hu/eredmenyek/a_pedagogussa_valas_es_a_szakmai_fejlodes_sztend erdjei.pdf 19-39.

Lamont, E., & Pyle, K. (2013). Teacher Voice Omnibus November 2012 Survey: New teachers'

standards and appraisal regulations. [UK] Department for Education. Retrieved from:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/190920/DEPAR TMENT FOR EDUCATION-RR283.pdf

Lipowsky, F., & Rzejak, D. (2015). Key features of effective professional development programmes for teachers. RICERCAZIONE, 27

MES. (2012). Teacher development program. Ministry of Education and Science [MES]. Retrieved

from www.meds.gov.mn/data/pdf/teacher%20development%20program.pdf. Accessed

October 1, 2017.

Mohanty, S. P. (2014). In-Service Training spells its Impact on Classroom Practices: Observation of Some Significant Variables at Elementary School Level. Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies (SRJIS), 2, 1264-1275.

NIE (2009). A Teacher education model for the 21st century: A Report by the National Institute of

Education, Singapore. Singapore: National Institute of Education. Retrieved from

http://www.nie.edu.sg/files/spcs/Te21_online_ver.pdf

OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS.

Paris; OECD. Retrieved August 07, 2009 http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/51/43023606.pdf Purevjav, D. & Molnár, E. K. (2016). A pilot study of needs assessment for in-service teacher training. In Molnár, Gy. & Bús, E. (eds.): CEA 2016: 14th Conference on Educational Assessment: Program; Abstracts. SZTE BTK Neveléstudományi Doktori Iskola, Szeged, Hungary. p. 143 Purevjav, D., & Molnár, E. K. (2017). What do teachers learn from in-service teacher training?

Molnár, É. & Vígh, T. (Eds.) CEA 2017 15th Conference on educational Assessment: Program. p. 138. Retrieved from http://www.edu.u-

szeged.hu/pek2017/download/PEK_2017_ABSZTRAKTKOTET.pdf

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1) 1-23. Retrieved from

http://www.hepgjournals.org/doi/abs/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

SIREP (2010). SIREP Report No 1: Teaching Competency Standards in Southeast Asian Countries Philippine: Seameo Innotech Regional Education Program. Retrieved from

http://www.seameo-innotech.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/SIREP1%20- %20Teaching%20Standard%20FINAL.pdf

Timperley H. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development. Educational Practices Series 18, Brussels: International Academy of Education.

Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and teacher education, 24(1), 80-91.

Published

2024-09-03