PERSISTENT GAPS: GLOBAL AND NATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON GENDER AND HIGHER EDUCATION

Authors

  • Christine Min Wotipka Stanford University Author

Abstract

To understand what is happening in higher education, it’s essential to look earlier in the education pipeline. As seen in this graph [Figure 1], the y-axis indicates the gender parity index, with 1 indicating gender parity or equality for men and women. This figure shows that at the beginning of the period (in 1990), enrollment rates favored men for all three levels of education, but this has changed considerably over time. As indicated by the green line with circles, primary education reached gender parity in 2013. For secondary education (as indicated by the blue line with squares), trends were similar as of the late 1990s, and there is now near gender equality. However, the slope for tertiary education (indicated by the top line) has always been much steeper. Gender parity was reached sooner – by around the year 2000 – and has continued to climb since then such that women outnumber men in tertiary education in many countries worldwide.

References

Berg, G. A. (2019). The rise of women in higher education: How, why, and what’s next. Rowan & Littlefield.

D’Apice, H. K., Song, J., & Wotipka, C. M. (2023). A milestone in pursuit of gender equality: Predicting first women presidents in U.S. higher education institutions, 1980–2018. [Unpublished manuscript]. Stanford University.

Female presidents of Ivy League schools [Photograph]. (2007). Glamour. https://www.glamour.com/story/female-presidents-of-ivy-league-schools

Kehoe, A. (2016). Stanford’s four most recent presidents: From left, Donald Kennedy, Gerhard Casper, John Hennessy, and Marc Tessier-Lavigne [Online image]. Stanford University. https://news.stanford.edu/2016/10/21/inauguration-president-marc-tessier-lavigne-pictures/#&gid=1&pid=2

Lee, S. S., Wotipka, C. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (2021). A cross-national analysis of women graduates with tertiary degrees in science, technology, engineering, and math, 1998–2018: Commonalities and variations. In H. K. Ro, F. Fernandez, & E. Ramon (Eds.), Gender equity in STEM in higher education: International perspectives on policy, institutional culture, and individual choice (13-26). Routledge.

Lee, S. S., Wotipka, C. M., Ramirez, F. O., & Song, J. (2023). To STEM or not to STEM: A cross-national analysis of gender and tertiary degree graduates in science, technology, engineering, and math, 1998–2018 [Unpublished manuscript]. Stanford University.

Nakagawa, M., Wotipka, C. M., Buckner, E., & Yiu, L. (2023). Faculty at globally ranked universities in comparative perspective: Differences by gender, fields, and tenure status [Unpublished manuscript]. Stanford University.

OECD. (2020). OECD Education Statistics Database. https://data.oecd.org/education.htm. Accessed March 30, 2022

Quilantan, B. (2023). Women rule the Ivies. https://www.womenspowergap.org/press-room/women-rule-the-ivies/

Sian Leah Beilock [Photograph]. (2023). Dartmouth. https://president.dartmouth.edu/about/people/sian-leah-beilock

UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO Institute for Statistics. http://data.uis.unesco.org/. Accessed March 30, 2022

Women rule the Ivies [Photograph]. (2023). Woman’s Power Gap. https://www.womenspowergap.org/press-room/women-rule-the-ivies/

Published

2023-06-02